Is there any reason to run your FT8 QSOs in the middle of WSPR area?
73 Joe
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] Im Auftrag von
g3kevmal@talktalk.net
Gesendet: Montag, 5. Februar 2018 19:21
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: LF: Re: MF/630M BAND
That is why CW or QRSS is the preferred mode ie THE REAL DEAL-NO TOYS OR
GUESSWORK
G3KEV
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Wilson
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 5:42 PM
To: N1BUG
Cc: dead.fets@gmail.com
Subject: Re: LF: MF/630M BAND
Hello Paul, great explanation, I understand now, these little black
box "toys" have their limitations :) Thank you, sorry to doubt you
Rik!
Monday, February 5, 2018, 4:57:02 PM, you wrote:
> On 02/05/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>
>> Hello Rik,
>>
>> Thanks, but hmmm, when I TX in JT-9 on LF N1BUG doesn't have spots
>> uploaded to PSK reporter site, although he receives me well. I asked
>> on the WSJT group and they said it wouldn't as no proper QSO was
>> completed.
> That is because the U3S cannot transmit a standard formatted CQ
> message. They may appear standard but they are not, they are sent as
> free text messages which WSJT-X does not recognize as a CQ, thus
> refuses to upload to PSK Reporter.
> Put another way, the WSJT-X software compresses CQ messages into a
> special format which the U3S does not do.
> Tonight we will all be using WSJT-X, thus our CQ messages should be
> properly encoded for recognition and upload to PSK Reporter at the
> receiving end.
> 73,
> Paul N1BUG FN55mf
--
Best regards,
Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com
|
