To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: LF: VLF Small magnetic antenna for Tx |
From: | "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 5 Feb 2018 19:15:39 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <CANM5rQinSd3xiwGrpArtpeNgi-pdX934zurtUHNT_kGTQY52XQ@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AB485D3@servigilant.vigilant.local> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <23159F1ED5BD49AD9654CE5685AFACF6@Clemens0811> <[email protected]> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AB4958F@servigilant.vigilant.local> <[email protected]> <CANM5rQgLnSAP+-hWxDieO4xJ5t_HQbZ3Byw4njBFjHgkbUDKyw@mail.gmail.com> <CANM5rQinSd3xiwGrpArtpeNgi-pdX934zurtUHNT_kGTQY52XQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thread-index: | AdOei868JKP1jDY0T42Ta3H5qsDPNgAHx7Lg |
Hi Leandro, > I have to say that I am also lacking in theory, but the One of your questions was: >Can we expect to receive the signal with an electric probe antenna in the near >field or the only chance is to be further away ? >From theory there is no doubt that the E-field is still ~ 30.3 times or 29.6dB >stronger (V/m vs A/m) than the H-field even in the near field of a magnetic transmitting loop at 38.4kHz and at 100m distance while in the far field the E-field is 51.5dB stronger. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Juan >Leandro Ronda >Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 3:14 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: LF: VLF Small magnetic antenna for Tx > > I have to say that I am also lacking in theory, but the >tests carried out on airborne and core coils have been > |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: MF/630M BAND, Chris Wilson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: MF/630M BAND, g3kevmal |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF Small magnetic antenna for Tx, Juan Leandro Ronda |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF Small magnetic antenna for Tx, DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |