To: | LineOne <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: EbNaut at 8270.01953125 |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 9 Jan 2018 16:24:07 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ewlX8V10x82NrLlD6FLeyc+2QwgTJ6auIrKEljDFEOg=; b=KqPM2pYJOzLrH6fmxGidkT2vp+bB+asp6+PUm9EXTMhTS7peeXKVJmXVOZP9M8I1LW aLOSXAfawTm3j5wrhLQi18MUgyuUe99+gxNvYWMp/5T9turxJi7HPhr2xa9tI7Cr3JLA Fa2VEqk29dUJSl8Zr7ePIejxwJqF2ykWr2lvQH7aIsRrzwIs871vODnEgtVkUqOLUmKo SNO2fr95tIUAJou1VrnSPsb6olO63rlnc+4ERxjNy2HLoJRHvqrbm0jbp773LH/dNj+v x0rsMqOgnTJPK6q3ESMOPtJ7IFFXNWGkqsXQx6UvcDk8e8qn7LHzVoc/0XGA1f1sHYTQ DyLg== |
In-reply-to: | <AB5C5F55D39BBF46BA47A2A4375A0C4501D2A415CB@PLNWPVEXMB01.ad.corp.globalstar.com> |
References: | <CANA3B6XjBJvarmGZXwNrMFXdZN5Vb7mQmTWPV41zT7DEfw5RtQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6WbU6DQ+Ga8HVdtzQQa4sNQHpj+afFvJ8VvgeVQJCVYKA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6VCdJbmto-DMgyTX+NC7u_pxnzUE9X16ADFDvOy6tETsw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <AB5C5F55D39BBF46BA47A2A4375A0C4501D2A415CB@PLNWPVEXMB01.ad.corp.globalstar.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
To properly measure that frequency would indeed take 3.17 years, and require a frequency standard comparable those NPL, NIST etc. have. ie appreciably better than 1 part in 10^12
I suspect that is just a quoted theoretical frequency The best we as radio amateurs can usually do is to use GPS which over the long term, ie hours or days, can be considered "spot on" which really means a few parts in 10^12 - probably on a good day, perhaps. Over the short term, seconds, tens of seconds, minutes I wouldn't expect a GPS derived standard to offer much better than a part in 10^10 so only allowing that frequency to be measured as 8270.019531 Andy G4JNT On 9 January 2018 at 16:09, David Weinreich <[email protected]> wrote:
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: EbNaut at 8270.01953125, David Weinreich |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: LF: EbNaut at 8270.01953125, Jacek Lipkowski |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: EbNaut at 8270.01953125, David Weinreich |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: EbNaut at 8270.01953125, Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |