To: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: EbNaut message over 2877 km, DK7FC to RC4HAA |
From: | DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de> |
Date: | Mon, 06 Nov 2017 16:31:55 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <30881e9f-de97-9536-59bf-f51e0aa3498d@abelian.org> |
References: | <15f68ccfd03-c09-1dcf0@webjas-vaa134.srv.aolmail.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1710291833570.23786@plato.ucs.mun.ca> <40168a26-8991-6998-e541-585a8575ad32@abelian.org> <59FCF49B.9050703@posteo.de> <59FF4368.5070904@posteo.de> <5A0064E2.9020605@posteo.de> <5A0067E5.5010009@posteo.de> <30881e9f-de97-9536-59bf-f51e0aa3498d@abelian.org> |
Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Sender: | owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Am 06.11.2017 16:14, schrieb Paul Nicholson: You were right about a message decode being more definitive than a one-pixel carrier detection. Yes, yesterday i could have said "this pixel is mine, see attachment". But everyone would be right when having serious doubts regarding certainty :-) 73, StefanPS: I remember UA0SNV has (and is) always been a good receive station. He got me on 137 kHz in DFCW-90 (22 mHz) and WSPR-15, several times. Distance would be about 5750 km. Just a little farer. Maybe it is worth to contact him...
|
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: EbNaut message over 2877 km, DK7FC to RC4HAA, Paul Nicholson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | AW: LF: Re[2]: VLF: EbNaut message over 2877 km, DK7FC to RC4HAA, markusvester@aol.com |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: EbNaut message over 2877 km, DK7FC to RC4HAA, Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: EbNaut message over 2877 km, DK7FC to RC4HAA, Chris Wilson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |