Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: RE: Combining LF amps revisited

To: Clemens Paul <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: RE: Combining LF amps revisited
From: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 10:10:28 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=APQBRb1a2s2JhnD8Z+XMEccgDb+De4phAefJV+K8OPI=; b=Lq/WShE3fakpYx5xUd4681Xw3Ql414XKNKs1idt1Pr8HllogupM6yQtEn1FXLriEvP P4ZZwPQq/TPv1ytUf7VgFnVLLr8D/vfJtD+B0q27GKyfpDRkU8Jxqo6ZUu85eJgPxcVC v/5Elrhkhv6YjMCRKeQvKj4wwrk+swRlXpHcgFLlrHtPYHY4oP79dsv9zwBPCsoqg2lK HKUJjRslDnwIOHma6jlMyO4ZrS/MW5qrIz2j5WY8IdUMexXGULOVButX8Sd5iG72T+MT DT4PFThm5u/p/m+oeCtlb++q3UAcOVwIzSDsDEpLMaDanjmR5yf8osw4cuBTQ6pj4tgg BTxA==
In-reply-to: <7F853E8736134DDDB2E616EF0826BECE@Clemens0811>
References: <[email protected]> <7F853E8736134DDDB2E616EF0826BECE@Clemens0811>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hello Clemens,


Thanks  for  the  corrections,  I  did  struggle a bit to get sensible
results,  but  put it down to user error :) No worries! I have built a
new  combiner  transformer  on  3  off 78 material stacked 2.4 inch OD
toroids,  using 3 times the number of turns. It runs a LOT cooler even
with  no  fan.  I  have  now  ordered some pot cores, but had to go to
Mouser  for  the  size  /  material I want to try. My e-mail says they
should  land  today. I want to try an auto transformer in the combiner
next. Comments welcome!


Sunday, May 21, 2017, 8:51:52 AM, you wrote:

> Hi Marco & Chris

> apologies for the delayed reply.
> There was indeed a typo.
> It should heave read 12.5Ohm because the amp is designed to work into
> a 50:4=12.5 Ohm load.
> Then there was another wrong entry:2000W instead of 1000 W as each 1kW amp 
> has its
> own 1:4 transformer.
> And there is another problem which I have detected meanwhile:
> The program calculates only for 50Ohm primary Z not e.g. 12.5Ohm.
> One could circumvent this shortcoming by entering 250W instead of 1kW for 
> calculating the
> correct flux density because 250W generate the same voltage over the primary 
> winding at
> 50 Ohm as 1000W at 12.5Ohm.But then the other parameters are calculcated 
> incorrectly.
> Maybe I'll contact the author if he can implement some
> changes/improvements  in his tool.

> 73
> Clemens
> DL4RAJ 







-- 
Best regards,
 Chris                            mailto:[email protected]


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>