Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: New carrier on 6470.005 Hz

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: New carrier on 6470.005 Hz
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:04:14 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <BC06FB131E2047AB94F399AE497C3A11@AGB> <[email protected]> <9E7678AF78C14D20B28472DF6749967A@AGB> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hello Paul,

Something went wrong. The transmission should have stopped at 11:48:16 UTC. But the PSK continues. Obviously i made a mistake. The symbol time is correct, one can also see it by the psk sidebands which have a null in +- 0.25 Hz 'distance' to the center frequency (http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html ).
I checked the txt file for the transmission, it contains 4384 symbols. That would fit the number of seconds for a 40 character message when all other parameters are set as announced. That transmission would stop at 12:52:16 UTC. The expected Eb/N0 would be even 0.2 dB lower. Let's just try and see what happens. I can give you the txt file for analysis if we can't manage a decode, then we at least see what went wrong...

So, an even higher challenge!

73, Stefan


Am 19.04.2017 11:19, schrieb Paul Nicholson:

Yes it looks borderline.  But the blanker setting I used
for the carrier measurements was appropriate for nighttime.

I can probably gain a dB or two when I decode the EbNaut
by using a daytime threshold.

So, cautiously optimistic on this one.

--
Paul Nicholson
--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>