Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz

from [Markus Vester]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz
From:	Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date:	Fri, 14 Apr 2017 11:34:22 -0400
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1492184063; bh=f26F66e9LH6iXqHNSdXximxjqBn2If9I4nFij7/ow/A=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=D234fIV4uCaUCF5bH/tjiJ/xyxlIdiag3THHxR5u6nxUgEFsLj1gciCJjwZHTlRTN RQ7kftIOzOLLegL0VCHX9oXu/mraMa2QqHD7a2fBN06isVXsj6nZWbFTB8qGO1wiBx 5ILX03mphkG5VVjCMBjkHIbP3k7Fs65uPIZFHy9Y=
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Thanks Paul! Yes I intend to leave it on for a while.

I wonder if you could measure the relative phase of Stefan's and my daytime carriers? Although the frequencies are different, the phases are referenced to a common timeframe (midnight UT). We have been discussing whether we could transit simultaneously on the same QRG with appropriately aligned TX phase, increasing the combined signal by ~2 dB.

73, Markus

-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Fr, 14. Apr 2017 17:14
Betreff: Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz

Markus wrote:

> since 13:30 I'm running a carrier on 6469.9975 Hz with 0.21 A.

Looks to be about 0.06 fT here, but not significant against the
noise floor in one hour integration. If you can run for 3 hours
it could show up well.

For comparison, Stefan's (nighttime) 6470 signal is about 0.18 fT.

--
Paul Nicholson
--

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz / iron powder cores in high electric fields, (continued) Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz / iron powder cores in high electric fields, DK7FC RE: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz / iron powder cores in high electric fields, hvanesce Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz, DK7FC VLF: EbNaut on 6470.1 Hz, DK7FC Re: VLF: EbNaut on 6470.1 Hz, Markus Vester Re: VLF: EbNaut on 6470.1 Hz, Paul Nicholson Re: VLF: EbNaut on 6470.1 Hz, Jacek Lipkowski LF: Re[2]: VLF: EbNaut on 6470.1 Hz, rn3aus Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, Markus Vester Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, Paul Nicholson Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, Markus Vester <= Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, Paul Nicholson Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, Markus Vester Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, Paul Nicholson Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, Markus Vester Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, Paul Nicholson Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, Markus Vester Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, DK7FC Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, DK7FC Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, Paul Nicholson Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, Gary - G4WGT

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] VO1NA 477 OP8 :Start 2300 finish 0900 50 watts to monopole., jcraig
Next by Date:	Re: LF: 136 OP32 last 24 Hr, Chris Wilson
Previous by Thread:	Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, Paul Nicholson
Next by Thread:	Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz, Paul Nicholson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]