To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: ULF: EbNaut over 3 wavelengths on ULF |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:37:53 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abelian.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=thmECjwRvQYfdQLK1DqpwSI35DR9XGpVEjeel5Iet7g=; b=dStFsGeoq16oLO4+uUO0ckplid sx1se7cMQNLontLbrV5HNA8k0EvHDckJtfxvYAiAXdRSqyxa6/xAF/1wAomzK0YZgj8J8ML6+fxmQ rH8jr4rwoW7DxxAzMSn0Z3/Um1EnnUwUrLqHA97/nttDnE1i16dpoUUFMdw8hjyv+nns=; |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
I'm surprised at the depth of the dips in the FDTD plots, is the amplitude scale correct? The FDTD results are consistent with my complete inability to detect anything of the 2970 Hz signal here, whereas 5170 Hz is quite easy to receive. It also suggests it would still not work at 2570 Hz but we should get a result at 4390 Hz. Currently, still nothing from Stefan's 2970 carrier in 48 hours, 5.8uHz bandwidth down to 0.01 fT. Not the slightest hint of signal. Stefan, maybe you want to try a higher frequency? 4390 not so good here but the range 4370 to 4380 is ok, 4378 looks best of all. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: ULF: EbNaut over 3 wavelengths on ULF, DK7FC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 160M, Roman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: ULF: EbNaut over 3 wavelengths on ULF, DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | Re: ULF: EbNaut over 3 wavelengths on ULF, DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |