To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Low QRN on VLF! |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 1 Oct 2016 07:44:11 -0400 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1475322252; bh=Lh2sDAsmOO17HT2iDJ4aH7CubI9qSS5KU3aSSHv7M7s=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yxzmTmjTgzjv3+MMg2czy8f2ISpGrwrOcKYEZZZ9NQye4EQdmFrOMDasPbTTXxZjK dgj7GS9IHbqtOBKgi72I2QebkE2Lqzm0FawRWfpPOOxTmKWuFyXNdBhbp3FynW+KO9 do/gRq4piIG1fiCCGKNBQC9nQG0Mw7IAiFm6uB2w= |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Now QRT at 11:45 UT. 73, Markus
-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: markusvester <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Sa, 1 Okt 2016 12:52 pm Betreff: AW: Low QRN on VLF! Sending a 10 uW carrier on 8270.0025 Hz since 8:20 UT. Somewhat surprisingly, the Heidelberg tree grabber seems to show a small peak, despite the unfavourable orientation of the N-S loop.
All the best, Markus (DF6NM)
Von: DK7FC
Hi VLF,
The VLF QRN dropped dramatically during the last weeks. It would be nice if someone would be on the air again there, providing some signals to decode :-) Does someone like to give it a try? :-)
73, Stefan
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: AW: Low QRN on VLF!, markusvester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: G3XIZ new email via PM please, James Cowburn |
Previous by Thread: | LF: AW: Low QRN on VLF!, markusvester |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Low QRN on VLF!, Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |