LF: AW: Low QRN on VLF!

To:	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: AW: Low QRN on VLF!
From:	<[email protected]>
Date:	Sat, 1 Oct 2016 12:52:53 +0200
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1475319174; bh=lhurfb8WorPf332sl6S1gAdZ/lcycf1O8geSCS8bYLE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ryWZecK+K6OzzOfNIWiN+gbCgN4qTPv+r3FuwoJgLBszgN6aiSkY0T1RfvDxuIjMY hFlFd0uokEhGqYcpnbpsOGe8buO7hIsbkrJVOZfW9x2862geBVrAIDI228d1O1m8Yo AL541HmCK/z3oOZq+9DcrvAJjnDGcnJV0fmr7Rjg=
Importance:	normal
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Sending a 10 uW carrier on 8270.0025 Hz since 8:20 UT. Somewhat surprisingly, the Heidelberg tree grabber seems to show a small peak, despite the unfavourable orientation of the N-S loop.

All the best,

Markus (DF6NM)

Von: DK7FC
Gesendet: Freitag, 30. September 2016 13:58
An: [email protected]
Betreff: VLF: Low QRN on VLF!

Hi VLF,

The VLF QRN dropped dramatically during the last weeks. It would be nice

if someone would be on the air again there, providing some signals to

decode :-)

Does someone like to give it a try? :-)

73, Stefan

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: AW: Low QRN on VLF!, markusvester <=

Previous by Date:	LF: 136kHz Sept 30th to Oct 1st, LineOne
Next by Date:	LF: Re: Low QRN on VLF!, Markus Vester
Previous by Thread:	LF: 136kHz Sept 30th to Oct 1st, LineOne
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: Low QRN on VLF!, Markus Vester
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]