To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 02 Apr 2016 19:09:52 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <BE734200305B425B80F4B637E774636F@White> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <BE734200305B425B80F4B637E774636F@White> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
Markus wrote: > I have uploaded the wavs Thanks I'm looking at those. Your wav 04010012.wav contains only samples values of +/- 1, eg sample ch1 ch2 0 1 1 1 1 -1 3 -1 1 4 -1 1 5 -1 -1 6 -1 1 ... Stefan's dk7fc_04010002.wav has samples like sample ch1 ch2 0 5.2787364e-06 -6.6896901e-06 1 -3.0420255e-05 4.7603622e-05 2 -2.1549407e-05 -2.1126121e-05 3 4.9282797e-05 -9.3932264e-05 4 -2.4563633e-05 -7.9385005e-05 5 2.7562026e-05 1.3096724e-05 6 -0.00012802938 0.00018837629 ... Is that intentional? I expect it might lose a dB or two. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz Sucess!?!, Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz Sucess!?!, DK7FC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, Laurence KL7 L |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, Markus Vester |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |