| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz |
| From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 03 Apr 2016 06:19:40 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <722AD2EA7A5540E8A548D89D60B3A9C2@White> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <BE734200305B425B80F4B637E774636F@White> <[email protected]> <722AD2EA7A5540E8A548D89D60B3A9C2@White> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
Markus wrote: > According to my favourite hex editor, ... first samples should be > 698.0 1628.0 > 2096.01 -4322.74 > ... Thanks, I see what's happening. It's the SoX utility which I use to convert the .wav to a data stream. The stupid program assumes that audio samples, even when using IEEE float formats, are restricted to amplitude +/- 1.0 We are seeing the severely clipped output of a stupid program. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, Markus Vester |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, DK7FC |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, Markus Vester |
| Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, DK7FC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |