To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: LF: XPQ WSPR15 475/136 |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 24 Oct 2015 16:56:01 -0400 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1445720161; bh=ZjpEhLgUeObEGrapnDM11IFJ5qH8olibsde13NRWE00=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1fbnZ8KTq7dTvqDXCEF7PXYk23ncVqNEP40cYEbNux6xcL8oS7vrlnr9yQzXhuYQ7 820iZYMSFiqzAvqSmaD4NPMiouNuZZ9qwk9DErGHJkaWXKq2ZgKMDHq8A+sJVbPru+ srqr75mYH0xitsbeaYXIv9vtM4q4dt7ctPJMg7/g= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Laurence,
thanks for the detailed info! Looks like you're set up pretty well to make use of whatever little straw of propagation you can cling to ;-)
Reason I asked was that I'd been contemplating a 137 / 475 k diplexer for my vertical. But after doing the analysis I gave up on it as the compromises regarding losses, bandwidth and voltages just seemed unacceptable.
So good luck and have a nice weekend,
Markus (DF6NM)
PS it looks like all your mails are getting through blacksheep. But you may not be getting them back yourself. I've been experiencing that effect now and then, and always found it pretty confusing.
Von: Laurence KL7 L <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Sa, 24 Okt 2015 7:04 pm Betreff: RE: LF: XPQ WSPR15 475/136 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: G3KEV report de F6CNI, mal hamilton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: RE: [rsgb_lf_group] QRSS questions, Rik Strobbe |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: XPQ WSPR15 475/136, Laurence KL7 L |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: XPQ WSPR15 475/136, Alan Melia |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |