LF: Re: Report de F6CNI to 2E0ILY

["F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB" <f6cni@orange.fr>]

Sorry Stefan,

 

I was very active on LF in the years 1999 / 2003 ( over 600 CW QSO and > 50 calls), but now I am only RX mode on 137 band, as most of the stations (as EI0CF and some others) which was active on in the past, over 12 years ago !

 

Andy.

 

From: DK7FC

Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 4:37 PM

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Subject: Re: LF: Report de F6CNI to 2E0ILY

 

Hi Andy,

I cannot hear him here at -17 dB SNR in WSPR-2.
You can hear him. So, will you try a CW QSO with him? :-)

If he improves his station, more stations could hear him. And maybe he will get reports from the far east...

73, Stefan

Am 14.10.2015 16:02, schrieb F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB:

Hello Chris.

 

Please : Do not change anything on your transmitting LF system. It is very very nice performing ! Have a look at your report here :

 

 

Stefan said that “We could easily have a QRSS-3 QSO with good SNR”. Sure, but also on normal CW mode up to 1000 km. Here you signal is 589 at 600 km, and + 42 dB over noise just measured on my SPM3 Pegglemesser !!!

 

I use a FT1000 MP receiver and an Inv L antenna base loaded in my garden located in center of a noisy large city.

 

73. Andy.

 

-----Message d'origine-----

From: DK7FC

Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 3:04 PM

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Subject: Re: LF: First LF TX's from 2E0ILY

 

Hi Chris,

 

Am 14.10.2015 13:35, schrieb Chris Wilson:

> [...] It's far from optimal right now,

 

...but your first signals are better then that of many other UK stns in

the past few years (except G3KEV :-) ).

We could easily have a QRSS-3 QSO with good SNR.