Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Report de F6CNI to 2E0ILY

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Report de F6CNI to 2E0ILY
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:37:36 +0200
In-reply-to: <4D638D6C1B484517A69974D791121971@pcn5>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <4D638D6C1B484517A69974D791121971@pcn5>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi Andy,

I cannot hear him here at -17 dB SNR in WSPR-2.
You can hear him. So, will you try a CW QSO with him? :-)

If he improves his station, more stations could hear him. And maybe he will get reports from the far east...

73, Stefan

Am 14.10.2015 16:02, schrieb F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB:
Hello Chris.
 
Please : Do not change anything on your transmitting LF system. It is very very nice performing ! Have a look at your report here :
 
image
 
Stefan said that “We could easily have a QRSS-3 QSO with good SNR”. Sure, but also on normal CW mode up to 1000 km. Here you signal is 589 at 600 km, and + 42 dB over noise just measured on my SPM3 Pegglemesser !!!
 
I use a FT1000 MP receiver and an Inv L antenna base loaded in my garden located in center of a noisy large city.
 
73. Andy.
 
-----Message d'origine-----
From: DK7FC
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: LF: First LF TX's from 2E0ILY
 
Hi Chris,
 
Am 14.10.2015 13:35, schrieb Chris Wilson:
> [...] It's far from optimal right now,
 
...but your first signals are better then that of many other UK stns in
the past few years (except G3KEV :-) ).
We could easily have a QRSS-3 QSO with good SNR.
 
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>