To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Today's soldering |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:00:33 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Vw4FDJMGz34w8s60nnrZJ+yk4XChfvLNVjJ2R+XQ8e4=; b=lJ8fnSUXIZHjBGBtauN5WcGO/uMLVskMObrSCQnwRr1NgvzKcSV8AP91KmUUH3OHcm Or+7T6zs9rxPdIF7Inqym3qTL0CrpyJHn/yAT7K0vOv/ELai1kqz68gWgT/7mks6d05W QrXebMpkmrn9uOLxm0DtRwu9ko360Gb04VVUoFAGtqIAn1sJvW2jJHKyV3Bqx0n9VQw6 cbFKepEZU9zF2zsXk11+BoHZBcE4GnM+9/FozirzRHuc3SeiX1YHLYmpwcFH8g3XMWhn jRbzkKEjuGoekWnMwsHVK6j792flqVF+5iR4ROwiGffP9r+UjdmB2ySbc5HddJgVSozF cANg== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <CAH5n-4Cu0ircO5ZswKLtwrN+Nji=y8dAvN_XvYPGR8KN0d4hgg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23QkO_LsNepkh48nyoS6k3GWZvbA=aze75QGB2fbN2qKCQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Assume you've tried putting an R||C in the source to bias the BF245 back a bit and still ensure oscillation? Does it make any difference to current consumption? Or run off a lower voltage. Try a 74HC4013 instead of an HEF4013 and run that off 3.3V as well as the FET; may work. I remember seeing the circuit of an old Phillips or Motorola personal radio of the 1970's era. All the RF stages were separately floating wrt. ground for both +ve and -ve rails, properly decoupled with capacitors. Then several stages were connected in series at DC to run off the high voltage rail that the battery gave without wasting power dropping the volts needlessly. Of course, each stage is forced to consume the same current, and biasing has to be arranged to drop the correct voltages across each stage, but it was a neat way to conserve power in the front end and IF amplifier stages. Can't remember, but I suspect it may have used J-FETS Constant current operation is a good way to bias J-FETs. They're notoriously difficult things to get biased exactly where you want them, so just force the current you want and let Vg sort itself out. Just downloaded the data sheet for the BF245 to see if it was anything special, then noticed it's the wire ended equivalent of the BF545 I already have the data sheet for. Andy G4JNT On 15 July 2015 at 13:16, DK7FC <[email protected]> wrote:
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Today's soldering, DK7FC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Today's soldering, DK7FC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Today's soldering, DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Today's soldering, DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |