To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: AW: LF: 630m OP8 |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Fri, 22 May 2015 19:03:14 -0230 (NDT) |
In-reply-to: | <97420A537655424BA746B1CC7184456C@White> |
References: | <[email protected]> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB1B104158@servigilant.vigilant.local> <CADW0j2kk7unwN29h_WbtvkeZ=Y_7qQcEBEhnF6Lf-uFycLGW4A@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <2B321770B05342789CC5672E2AB8C905@AGB> <[email protected]> <D7108BC2C9E841BEA36B514FAF0B4885@AGB> <[email protected]> <2C9ABA4A4A0642778DF34060BBB1F25F@AGB> <[email protected]> <00a801d093a0$cffc8e30$6ff5aa90$@de> <[email protected]> <97420A537655424BA746B1CC7184456C@White> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Markus, Thanks for the report. Its good to hear that the RF crossed the pond and all that land. The TX will be off tonight -- there is lightning in the forecast. 73 and thanks to all who monitored. 73 Joe VO1NA On Fri, 22 May 2015, Markus Vester wrote: Last night I pushed the antenna out again and ran MF opds-8 and WSPR. Traces from VO1NA were weakly visible in the spectrogram between about midnight and 2 UT, resulting in a single opds detection at 0:36 with an unambiguous 16.6 dB correlation peak. This is quite gratifying, considering the time of the year and the rather mediocre noise situation in my suburban location. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: MF 630m: False Decode or Real?, Graham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: MF 630m: False Decode or Real?, g3zjo |
Previous by Thread: | Re: AW: LF: 630m OP8, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | Re: AW: LF: 630m OP8, Graham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |