Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: MF 630m: False Decode or Real?

To: <rsgb_lf_gro[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: MF 630m: False Decode or Real?
From: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 20:02:29 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]om>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]om>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Latest RadCom (June 2015)  Page 70
 
 
''If this  compression is used , any noise that  gets  past the  decoder will  generate  a random call sign that looks 
as if it could be  valid  . This is  seen in the  WSPR  system occasionally, such decodes are rare but they do  happen'' 
 
Meanwhile back at  tranquillity  base .......
 
24  Hours  wspr  LF
 
Seems to  of  been  a RARE   24  hours of  RARE  dx  prefixes   M'Lud  ?
 
 
24 Hours  Opera 136  with both data and dynamic ,
nothing  except  wholesome gluten free  decodes  and detections
 
 
A compelling   closing    argument   M'Lud  ?
 
 
73- Graham
G0NBD
 
Opera  the  right  smart pants  mode  Smile emoticon
 
 
 

Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: LF: MF 630m: False Decode or Real?

Latest RadCom (June 2015)  Page 70
I rest my case,  M'lud :-)

Andy G4JNT

On 20 May 2015 at 19:02, Jochen Althoff <[email protected]> wrote:
Just popped up at my RX:

17:52    477 VK3ELV de DF1VB/3 Op8 Deep Search ?? 16348 km -37 dB in Dortmund with 140w + Top loaded L 18m vert 80m horz

Any comments welcome

73, Jochen



--
 -= DF1VB =-
 -= KH2MM =-
Jochen Althoff
+49 171 2020206

"The wireless telegraph is not difficult to understand.
The ordinary telegraph is like a very long cat.
You pull the tail in New York, and it meows in Los Angeles.
The wireless is the same, only without the cat."
(Albert Einstein)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>