To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: LF: WSPR MF please |
From: | "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:53:17 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <EE3DFCFE011040DE9D53C4F86E69C65F@Clemens0811> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <EE3DFCFE011040DE9D53C4F86E69C65F@Clemens0811> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thread-index: | AdBD9QOWpXllDJu2QQ22RWurEkKyNwAtVFEwAC3kYJA= |
>-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DK7FC >Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 12:13 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: LF: WSPR MF please >>Probably the >>matched antenna does not act as a perfect bandpass for all >>frequecies and maybe there's a standing wave on the 20m long >>coax cable, resulting in a high input voltage in the HF or >>lower VHF range? No matter how your antenna behaves on any frequencies the SWR is always exclusively determined by your receiver's input impedance. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 23:16 477 VO1NA de G8LCO Op8 -34 dB F:16% in Welwyn Herts, jcraig |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: DCFW and QRSS opportunity 475kHz - beaming VK/ZL :0-), Laurence KL7 L |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: WSPR MF please, Clemens Paul |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: WSPR MF please, Markus Vester |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |