Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Opera true/false?

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Opera true/false?
From: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 13:34:35 -0000
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
In the last 24 hours on 136kHz there have been several Opera decodes 
flagged up with question marks (and shown in red), indicating they 
need further examination to determine whether they are genuine true 
decodes.

Amongst the obviously false ones are SV8CS and 2E0ILY reporting 
JA8SCD who claimed to be running very low power. SV8CS was also 
reported by JA8SCD/1 but was not reported in Europe at the same time. 


A couple of spots of UA4WPF are unlikely, especially one by JA8SCD/1 
over a daylight path.

More probable are various reports of LA3EQ's QRP tests overnight by 
DL-SWL, though the report from RW3ADB may not be good.

The reliable, true Deep Search reports (shown in green) included 
SV8CS de SP5XSB, RN3AGC de 2E0ILY and RN3AGC de G0KTN, which are all 
paths that would not have been reported without Deep Search.

Just looking at a single night it appears that the current system of 
red = 'probably not' and green = 'highly likely' (my description) 
works well.

A couple of times, a station was decoded by Deep Search, and then 10 
minutes or so later were reported by the same station using regular 
Op at a much higher S/N. This effect is also seen on OPDS. 

The only minor problem is that reports of your own signal are also 
shown in red, which is slightly confusing.

So far, so good.

Mike, G3XDV
==========


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>