To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Re: VLF: 8270 Hz BPSK |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Mon, 29 Dec 2014 17:21:57 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kabelmail.de; s=mail; t=1419870121; bh=wsKHmHrnrtG64cZkR7lHfzPmXlu+BcwQfTojy0g8cJ8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=k5CNa5/Et4/rneVewKA1yxsy47hT3Ei6848Q23ai7AszBOLl+0xxZecDmfMPbKU+3 Utl+vfQyhj0KEbsT/ws9XvVgEszXNxB1uHQiJ+6UPdpWvDIH7Y6ThXoxKr4g7XTkpw m13X5PaNHYAsHWIWdB6NurVclLAJ416A5nu7G43Q= |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Paul, Markus, Code:Rate 1/18 K = 25 Von: [email protected]
Gesendet: 29.12.2014 15:19 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: VLF: 8270 Hz BPSK I searched for the message using start times between 11:00:00.0 and 11:00:02.0 but nothing decoded. The earlier carrier had S/N 11.7 dB compared with the 14.7 dB you had in November. Hopefully the S/N improves from 11:00 onwards. It will be lucky to decode at 11.7 dB with symbol length 10 seconds. I am getting some reference carrier extraction with a symbol timing offset of about 4 seconds, if I scan from about 10:30 onwards. Maybe the start time is something like 10:??:?4.0 I'll try 10:30:04.0, 10:40:04.0, 10:50:04.0 ... -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: 8270 Hz BPSK, Paul Nicholson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: 138.000 khz signal ??, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: 8270 Hz BPSK, Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: 8270 Hz BPSK, Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |