To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: RE: Japan on 475 kHz. |
From: | Dimitrios Tsifakis <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 23 Dec 2014 12:58:02 +1100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=cVr4jGw8AhZCGnsrmWhO1oqYh+ZJu7DP8FVitSMLigg=; b=Mwfx65XReSYitmVvgmyBF7H1a2BmdiBaXquUPYMqNuBC7lwwhC+Au3vR2jdwPowN1R pZs4LMBzuzkBUoDU8HVsx1KfqtDLLXtXSil5md1+iXck78xfkvFtngOwMJriOjXmLWSq /dIhqqCdmjOPZZbpKue3GBtpdhqpBWr9bvioKzeSH5eL3HY5osjqc+Euqz2ONR+00lDR Zuo/0nrYl/tyC6XKkH9TDyjty1eVCQ9zkRLjmpR+VD2UlKMGUwApFLT0YJdi7BBI47LS k7QFK8nfSmFfr+KhaD1yYn8CK9HsQDAm1Xc8564bI2l3lJAu/gv3dW6yh4GfjfoQI6Mk WDNQ== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <CAKvcm2e9gshSiL4kSM0FQfzWZtpgX2CpVs=5_eD7Yi5gt6RDbQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAKvcm2fTDHPt9sDOdFwFZiAimAme63eK_t=tH0+xhUax7iLdAg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Hideho san, >> I use a low pass filter which ensures that the harmonics are -50 dBc or >> lower. I think the tuned antenna also helps with not radiating too much > My quick calculation resulted in -120dBc necessary, to reduce QRM to adjacent > houses, > (I may be wrong)., and I am thinking how to make it. In Australia, for frequencies below 30 MHz we need to reduce our harmonics by the lesser of: 1) 43 db + 10*log(PEP) 2) 50 dB where PEP is peak power to the antenna. When I was allocated an experimental license for 500 kHz, I was asked to demonstrate that my harmonics are reduced by 60 dB (from memory). 73, Dimitris Vk1SV |
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: RE: Japan on 475 kHz., Hideho YAMAMURA |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: RE: Japan on 475 kHz., Laurence KL7 L |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: RE: Japan on 475 kHz., Hideho YAMAMURA |
Next by Thread: | RE: LF: RE: Japan on 475 kHz., Hideho YAMAMURA |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |