To: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: 8819.9 Hz in Virginia? |
From: | wolf_dl4yhf <dl4yhf@freenet.de> |
Date: | Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:25:40 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <01b701d0161e$c6a4bf60$53ee3e20$@comcast.net> |
References: | <5489EFBC.3050401@abelian.org> <5489F474.4030904@abelian.org> <5489FA44.3010709@abelian.org> <548AA644.4030707@abelian.org> <01b701d0161e$c6a4bf60$53ee3e20$@comcast.net> |
Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Sender: | owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
Hello Jim, you asked:> Can I inspect previously captured Spectrum Lab data at higher resolution by accessing a data file, or perhaps by opening a new waterfall-display window? Only if you logged the input ("audio") as file, *.wav or *.ogg.From the spectra which may still reside in SL's "scroll-back" buffer it's impossible to re-calculate an FFT with more resolution because the data in that buffer are -by *default*- only amplitude spectra which cannot be converted back from short-time Fourier transforms into the time domain. So, in short: Use SL's audio logging feature to capture the raw (or, maybe, slightly compressed) data. Can be activated as shown in the manual... from the main menu: "File".."Audio Files and Streams"..."Save input as audio file". Then, we can do all kinds of post-processing on the time domain data. Cheers, Wolf . |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: 8957 Hz, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 8957 Hz, Paul Nicholson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: 8819.9 Hz in Virginia?, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | LF: RE: 8819.9 Hz in Virginia?, hvanesce |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |