Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: HGA22 vrs DCF39

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: HGA22 vrs DCF39
From: Laurence KL7 L <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 17:41:44 -0800
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: [email protected] does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <DF31784F09AC43A0960C8FE9D43525F9@gnat>
References: <[email protected]> <DF31784F09AC43A0960C8FE9D43525F9@gnat>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Typically.... HGA22 was 5dB (or more fare dependent)  stronger in china, 
singapore and Fiji but here in KL7 DCF39 just wins...

> On May 12, 2014, at 3:43 PM, "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Edgar some but not all may be due to the ERP .......HGA22 runs twice the 
> ERP of DCF39 from memory of when I was logging them here.
> 
> Alan
> G3NYK
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "edgar" 
> <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 11:42 PM
> Subject: LF: HGA22 vrs DCF39
> 
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> It is interesting to compare the difference between the HGA22 and DCF39 
>> signals at a distance greater than 16000 km.
>> 
>> The difference in signal level at 21:00 UTC on the 12-5-2014 is ~ 13 dB.
>> 
>> The difference in path length is ~ 562 km or about 3%.
>> 
>> Refer to
>> 
>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/101251787/testIDC.html
>> 
>> Regards, Edgar
>> Moonah, Tasmania.
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>