LF: HGA22 vrs DCF39

To:	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: HGA22 vrs DCF39
From:	edgar <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 13 May 2014 08:42:09 +1000
Authentication-results:	mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: [email protected] does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Cc:	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0

Hi,

It is interesting to compare the difference between the HGA22 and DCF39signals at a distance greater than 16000 km.


The difference in signal level at 21:00 UTC on the 12-5-2014 is ~ 13 dB.

The difference in path length is ~ 562 km or about 3%.

Refer to

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/101251787/testIDC.html

Regards, Edgar
Moonah, Tasmania.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: HGA22 vrs DCF39, edgar <= LF: Re: HGA22 vrs DCF39, Alan Melia Re: LF: Re: HGA22 vrs DCF39, edgar Re: LF: Re: HGA22 vrs DCF39, Laurence KL7 L

Previous by Date:	RE: LF: WSPR-15 on 137 kHz today, Dave G3WCB.
Next by Date:	LF: Re: HGA22 vrs DCF39, Alan Melia
Previous by Thread:	LF: psk reporter down all day ??, Graham
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: HGA22 vrs DCF39, Alan Melia
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]