Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: 136 kHz TA

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: 136 kHz TA
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 20:23:15 +0200
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=EfL+3g1a0rHDBYrESksHhcw1bsCFB/u4EQxxvEvprME=; b=uSdYx/6bB7Sn7SH2sXuZCYHPSXLUdLfWwDtcXjOonHmJLcBPqK4dF9o9B+3dYlef9k 8soYgXywFzPUf1BS0kzMhJCRaJdSVcZbh9w7MBCFHJziHtP5yoBEh1vCO6fivp5S5UeL 0Q0kVscDIP3TTVUY27fy2+hjQRTY0K4jWSQDPqE25ePa59iCNf382fhuL7FAroLuM+9I KB5Skr1wDlAL/e88Go0jtOWAXR1OsAO1m3xYCKUIxKqn73wVDgpJGqkv6O02MPOwvrst Q2G3TzqcUcw4i4mDUbH3AHXcdzZBxstqboYXsNHXBye3Lf5uH4smrIuj02sjw+bTgVe5 mc2w==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hello John, Markus,

Thanks for the report and transmissions.
Yes, the SpecLab settings look better now but i think the FFT bin width is still a bit wide (45 mHz?). From my point of view, 22 mHz is the best choice but there are some who prefer 28 mHz or 14 mHz... And do you use a noise blanker?

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 13.04.2014 20:16, schrieb f6hcc 56:
Hello Stefan, Markus and All,
 
This morning I found the captures of your transmission.
Better, but I thing that is a little trouble with dust in the variable capacitor of my loop.
I try to fix this for your next transmissions.
 
 
Best 73
John / F6HCC / IN87HS
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 136 kHz TA

Stefan,
 
>> It is good to have some continuity ...
 
yes, I would much second your point of view. Just getting more conservative with the years? May not always be so bad ;-)
 
Will get on again on 136172.5 tonight, hourly after midnight UT.
 
Thanks for paving the way, and keeping the skies warm for us ;-)
 
73 es CUL,
Markus (DF6NM)

From: DK7FC
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 136 kHz TA


Am 12.04.2014 18:19, schrieb Andy:
>   Stefan what your plan for to night on LF?
>  73!

Hi Andy,

Same procedure as (nearly) every evening ;-) Right now i'm TXing
DFCW-180 to give a chance for Edgar in Tasmania who put a lot of effort
in his LF setup in a remote location. Later i switch to DFCW-90, same
frequency as usual.

It is good to have some continuity to stay in a good old mode on a good
old frequency, in times where more bands and modes do appear and where
activity appears to be spread and somehow lost...

73, Stefan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>