Hello John, Markus,
Thanks for the report and transmissions.
Yes, the SpecLab settings look better now but i think the FFT bin width
is still a bit wide (45 mHz?). From my point of view, 22 mHz is the
best choice but there are some who prefer 28 mHz or 14 mHz... And do
you use a noise blanker?
73, Stefan/DK7FC
Am 13.04.2014 20:16, schrieb f6hcc 56:
Hello Stefan, Markus and All,
This morning I found the captures of
your transmission.
Better, but I thing that is a little
trouble with dust in the variable capacitor of my loop.
I try to fix this for your next
transmissions.
Best 73
John / F6HCC / IN87HS
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Saturday, April 12, 2014 9:47 PM
Subject:
Re: LF: 136 kHz TA
Stefan,
>> It is good to have some continuity ...
yes, I would much second your
point of view. Just getting more conservative with the years? May
not always be so bad ;-)
Will get on again on 136172.5
tonight, hourly after midnight UT.
Thanks for paving the way, and
keeping the skies warm for us ;-)
73 es CUL,
Markus (DF6NM)
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 136 kHz TA
Am 12.04.2014 18:19, schrieb Andy:
> Stefan what your plan for to night on LF?
> 73!
Hi Andy,
Same procedure as (nearly) every evening ;-) Right now i'm TXing
DFCW-180 to give a chance for Edgar in Tasmania who put a lot of effort
in his LF setup in a remote location. Later i switch to DFCW-90, same
frequency as usual.
It is good to have some continuity to stay in a good old mode on a good
old frequency, in times where more bands and modes do appear and where
activity appears to be spread and somehow lost...
73, Stefan
|
|
