To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 09 Mar 2014 19:44:12 +0000 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<FA723BF050144798AD076EB0C9190D21@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<A47BA5540C3B42619C724008CDF3A0ED@White> <[email protected]> <2FC5CAB271A6437CB35A5B100185CEDA@White> <[email protected]> <7DB9DD5669FC4C648838510DCAC08AFB@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <850A470A5B9F4483BED8B49D4791044A@White>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <76F90E9771CA44F3981F679241E1A005@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected] et> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
Jim wrote: > was the quick phase change of 120 degrees > corrected prior to integration? I'm plotting the signal in 20 minute integrations so there isn't much loss due to the phase change. We had about 120 deg phase change on the night of 6th/7th but it took 6 hours, not 2. Here I plot three nights of opera alongside NAA for comparison of amplitudes http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140309b.gif -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz - ice and all, Bob Raide |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: DJ8WX midday, Markus Vester |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz, hvanesce |
Next by Thread: | RE: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz, hvanesce |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |