To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Activity etc. |
From: | Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 06 Mar 2014 19:52:59 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 |
Hi Tobias "The lack of QSO-activity of any mode is a social "problem" in my view" Yes, you're probably right. My concern was that WSQ would despair like many great mode before. Byway , I see some (not you) are trying to make this as an "pro/con" CW conflict . I am not going into that. This hobby has many facets and I have my favorites. CW , RTTY, contesting and pilups are not "my cup of tea" . I will stick to low power digi mode :) 73 de LA5VNA S |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal?, Bob Raide |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: LF: New OPERA OP/OPDS 2H tonight on 27.945 Dial Freq..., Bob Raide |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Activity etc., John Rabson |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Acivity etc., Chris |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |