To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: LF: Re: U.S. VLF License WH2XBA |
From: | "hvanesce" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 2 Mar 2014 02:07:43 -0500 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass (test mode) [email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1393744089; bh=xtl13WmLtQ4XtyFjSLd+rSH1hK6POy4hCkRwO/9+R3Q=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=XrIsJjon0FixmQN8E/ivb6LgHnVLm60u42LFPLmfWuR/Ld2lTZc1f0rrF8CO1L+Ms 5H7/+Fyzky3bBhUbrZhopF98uG31w7UD2i0oCto5wOUh16hvVXSadQOFSMdb8YUxwz Q9e1W+JFdWXjz7FuiyAchcMh7+9++reAJQ7G0vIdpCCgp4H3t1jyJOnwA7mdgxWszt Q9SRLc5QtyeHZf3e6X8MajUACWwZdcgY3el3iZCam288ruCLkHO9RSjzH60WHEjPsM BFY0uybMoOoITeqHGb5C3AEN9igFUAs9yab8yNeskAPhxL152yYBQCpi7zlQPHBZ1I Dy9StFOl8jDgw== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <002201cf35d6$cec627c0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <003301cf35d8$3b99d8a0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thread-index: | AQG7J8ziKVVG/mg/uhyoIlkn/fpcsAH7eixpAdmodO4CIroP7gNyyNBAAcs448wCxIOnLwKVef+aAwd25voBnzbxaQLMMrnrAkHNqGsC1ANz+poMt46Q |
Your data seems generally consistent with Bob's intended switch-on time: in an early message he said he was switching off to go to dinner, and *intended* to switch back on at 2330. Jim -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Nicholson Sent: Sunday, March 2, 2014 1:51 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: LF: Re: U.S. VLF License WH2XBA Jim wrote: > did the signal appear at or near Bob's switch-on time? I don't know the switch-on time but here is a series of 10 minute measurements in 1.66 mHz bandwidth, 2014-03-01_23:25:00 0.02 fT -58.9 deg 2014-03-01_23:30:00 0.02 fT -173.7 deg 2014-03-01_23:35:00 0.01 fT 120.7 deg 2014-03-01_23:40:00 0.02 fT -45.8 deg 2014-03-01_23:45:00 0.02 fT -111.9 deg 2014-03-01_23:50:00 0.05 fT 161.8 deg 2014-03-01_23:55:00 0.04 fT -113.2 deg 2014-03-02_00:00:00 0.07 fT -69.5 deg 2014-03-02_00:05:00 0.02 fT -145.9 deg 2014-03-02_00:10:00 0.05 fT 134.2 deg 2014-03-02_00:15:00 0.07 fT 108.9 deg 2014-03-02_00:20:00 0.06 fT 122.3 deg 2014-03-02_00:25:00 0.09 fT 106.8 deg 2014-03-02_00:30:00 0.16 fT 91.1 deg 2014-03-02_00:35:00 0.12 fT 89.6 deg 2014-03-02_00:40:00 0.10 fT 95.5 deg 2014-03-02_00:45:00 0.11 fT 90.5 deg 2014-03-02_00:50:00 0.12 fT 94.5 deg 2014-03-02_00:55:00 0.13 fT 101.5 deg 2014-03-02_01:00:00 0.10 fT 92.0 deg Time is start time of 10 minute measurement. Looks like it came on within +/- 5 mins of 00:30 UT - but was there some tune-up or something before then, say from 00:10 onwards? Hard to say from here. Background noise starts to rise rapidly from about 23:30 but this is distinguishable by its random phase. Phase seems to go steady from 00:10 onwards. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: Re: U.S. VLF License WH2XBA, hvanesce |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: U.S. VLF License WH2XBA, Paul Nicholson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: U.S. VLF License WH2XBA, Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: U.S. VLF License WH2XBA, Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |