|
Wolf,
rather than adding features to the WSQ
sourcecode, why not use SpecLab as an audio preprocessor? A couple of
nights ago, inserting the noise blanker function seemed to make a
big improvement on the WSQ.display, and the mixer will be useful
to become agile with my fixed frequency receiver. Using the free
version VAC 3.12 which doesn't do audio reformatting, I had
to set SpecLab to 32 kHz samplerate stereo.
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: LF: De F6CNI : Test WSQ
Hi
Steinar and Andre,
Thanks for the 2nd QSO Steinar - after QSY, you were
perfectly readable
until that carrier in the center of the WSQ passband got
too strong.
For me, 477.3 kHz instead of 477.5 "USB dial" seems to be a
better
choice at the moment.
But I will continue to monitor the waterfall
and see if other carriers
creep in there.
I consider using a longer FFT +
inverse FFT as automatic notch filter
for those 'super stable' carriers,
which would be nulled out after
multiple WSQ2 symbols. Will ask the author
for the sourcecodes, since I
am quite familiar with "C".
About 472.2
"dial" .. even with the 1 kHz audio tone added, collisions
with CW are more
or less pre-programmed..
So my vote would be for a weak-signal *QSO*
frequency range at the end
of the band.
But before that, I will observe
that rarely-used segment (except maybe
for a beaconing mode which I don't
use) a bit longer.
73,
Wolf DL4YHF .
Am
13.02.2014 20:34, schrieb Steinar Aanesland:
> I have been in qso with
Wolf on 477.50, but I lost him in heavy QRM. I
> will qsy 472.200 but I am
probably to weak for you .
>
> LA5VNA
S
>
>
>
>
>
> On 13.02.2014 19:59, André
Guyé wrote:
>> HI all,
>>
>> I can transmit on WSQ
mode now.
>>
>> Is somebody wants to try that
?
>>
>> I am on 472.200 dial USB, but I can change this
QRG...
>>
>> 73 de F6CNI
Andy.
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Ce courrier
électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la
protection avast! Antivirus est active.
>> http://www.avast.com
>>
>
>
>
>
>
|
