Hi Steinar and Andre,
Thanks for the 2nd QSO Steinar - after QSY, you were perfectly readable
until that carrier in the center of the WSQ passband got too strong.
For me, 477.3 kHz instead of 477.5 "USB dial" seems to be a better
choice at the moment.
But I will continue to monitor the waterfall and see if other carriers
creep in there.
I consider using a longer FFT + inverse FFT as automatic notch filter
for those 'super stable' carriers, which would be nulled out after
multiple WSQ2 symbols. Will ask the author for the sourcecodes, since I
am quite familiar with "C".
About 472.2 "dial" .. even with the 1 kHz audio tone added, collisions
with CW are more or less pre-programmed..
So my vote would be for a weak-signal *QSO* frequency range at the end
of the band.
But before that, I will observe that rarely-used segment (except maybe
for a beaconing mode which I don't use) a bit longer.
73,
Wolf DL4YHF .
Am 13.02.2014 20:34, schrieb Steinar Aanesland:
I have been in qso with Wolf on 477.50, but I lost him in heavy QRM. I
will qsy 472.200 but I am probably to weak for you .
LA5VNA S
On 13.02.2014 19:59, André Guyé wrote:
HI all,
I can transmit on WSQ mode now.
Is somebody wants to try that ?
I am on 472.200 dial USB, but I can change this QRG...
73 de F6CNI Andy.
---
Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce
que la protection avast! Antivirus est active.
http://www.avast.com
|
