Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LF: 8.9KHz

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LF: 8.9KHz
From: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 03:39:49 -0700
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass (test mode) [email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1387708814; bh=6SwLMylrf/jeTo6IgtTcnVH6f8H4C74NsDnoCAmLr6c=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=BRvgSOc5H+6mlDwWyGPw5DitPJ2MDRyOwzYafH0+Fz+Toro8EUBozawpXQbdAMPNr r5LaCylRm5zWI3ek+AkoqufQlMi37ZRQnOD+2o2rysuunAQMrU9kPTtdDz03kGy1aa JMUF2qnN1g38WkSiOzrkNNDrmQRMs1MVJW9dt0RMXZ32Uz150AYaMWpCC5PWOISUfv 7X4p4+I5M+NYkDp9Vt9bObO9UTsojvWEhBxTC7FTi0MtmnPYui9qZqjd1bmsho8n/Q c6AKVbGI6lfSA4gaKXJum7ti6WUL4vsu9RNvV//NxvmG+tJHRtZXXWbRppm+3lO8A6 UfWN5++3Fq+7w==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AQIxGS/PBu/qqC8AuaBg5i9+xy9Z8gHD33oqAhDZhDQBgInQAwHuZBgDmWG0pWA=
Peter,

Thank you, I had no idea how to run multiple instances of SpecLab, and had
assumed that it could take some time to learn, and that there could be
driver conflicts or memory conflicts. As soon as I read your message I
opened a second instance of SpecLab and enjoyed the show. Running multiple
bandwidths will save so much time; I had been losing time and data by
aborting collection to check a frequency-offset calibration marker at a
higher frame rate (broader bandwidth), or to check adjacent-spectrum noise. 

I just opened four windows at different bandwidths and see that I can watch
and manage local noise using one of the windows while searching, monitoring
(and assessing remote interferers) in the other windows. This is a wonderful
tool, thank you for taking the time to help me with it. 

73,  Jim AA5BW


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of PA1SDB, Peter
Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2013 2:09 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: 8.9KHz

Hello Jim,
Or check VLF grabber www.qsl.net/pa1sdb
Did you know that it is easy to start and run several Spectrum Lab sessions
at one PC ?
Just hit the SL start icon again and reconfigure it.

I have here a "Retro" 1000 MHz PC who has 4 SL running for 4x.
The 4 are published at www.qsl.net/pa1sdb grabber.
I commit, that PC does nothing els besides VLF RX.

So why not run a Wideband, 424, 238 and 47 uHz for example :-)

73's, Peter - PA1SDB



Am 22.12.2013 00:28, schrieb hvanesce:
> I anyone planning 8.9kHz tests in the near future? I'll have SpecLab 
> running in the VLF from now on except for upgrades. What is the best 
> frequency range to monitor? I have been planning to use 47uHz bandwidth.
>
> 73, Jim AA5BW
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stefan 
> Schäfer
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 8:54 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: LF: 8.9KHz
>
> Hi Eddie,
>
> Yes, maybe this weekend, if the WX permits. I just made some 
> optimisations to the PA und will do more changes to the system.
> I will announce it one day in advance or so.
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
> Am 18.12.2013 13:11, schrieb g3zjo:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> Are there any more 8.9KHz tests planned for the near future. I missed 
>> Stefan's last.
>>
>> I look forward to any that come up, plenty of warning appreciated please.
>>
>> 73 Eddie G3ZJO
>>
>
>




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>