Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LF: 74.5495 QRSS 60 starts at 2330 till 0500 at least...

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LF: 74.5495 QRSS 60 starts at 2330 till 0500 at least...
From: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:39:10 -0400
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>,,<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>,<[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Joe;
Jay, W1VD is an expert with older receivers.  I hope Jay may have some comments to help.  It certainly appears it is very sensitive and just needs a stable HFO that you already mentioned-Bob
 
> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:47:09 -0230
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: LF: 74.5495 QRSS 60 starts at 2330 till 0500 at least...
>
> Hi Jim, Bob, Group.
>
> The clock was UTC. The sigs increased until the capture then suddenly
> disappeared. Thanks for the confirmation, Bob. The RX seems to work well
> except the HFO needs work. A plan is to tap the 10.7 MHz OCXO LO to clock
> an AD 9851 dds at 6x and use the output as the HFO. I think this will be
> more stable, but it could be a silly idea. Comments are welcomed.
>
> 73
> Joe VO1NA
>
>
>
> > If the clocks on Mike and Joe's spectrograms are both in UTC, the terminator
> > idea is probably wrong.
> >
> > If the clocks on Mike and Joe's spectrograms are both in local time, I
>
> This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at
> http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>