Alan;
I appreciate your input on 73. It was my idea to have Warren Zeigler file an app just to see what might happen at our FCC. I had heard the staff at our FCC was instructed to welcome experimenters for the lower freqs. Warren filed it but told me nothing may come of it but they granted us the license!
I am using a tube amp [3cx3000A7] with pi-net output and can make 2 kw easily. But only have a 90' high tower and at the top is the center feed point of my 75 meter double extended zepp. I simply short the open wire line which runs almost vertically and fed it with allot of inductance in series! I assume the two 150' legs acts as top loading. Ground system is from my broadcast experience where for field intensity surveys 36" wide chicken wire was used with a 100' tower most often and a 250 transmitter. Eight 50' chicken wire radials produced decent field on the midband channels [1000 kHz or so] to measure from. Here I am using several 150' radials of chicken wire radials. I hope to stretch some out to 300' but that's going to be about it at my location. I have made it out to Kansas just two days ago with solid QRSS 60 sigs daytime.
I am running just about 1.5 KW into the ant. The voltage at the feedpoint draws over a 2" spark to a screw driver so am about at the power top end I think.
Here in the finger lakes region of NY State the winter ground conductivity goes to 8 or better to the NE with several finger lakes East of me. If I were on the coast I think it would be a snap to hit the UK over the salt water. Going to be harder for me inland here.
Any comments would be appreciated-Bob
From:
[email protected]To:
[email protected]Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 01:16:12 +0100
Subject: Re: LF: TA CW?
Hi Bob, the propagation conditions are very similar
to the other LF bands ....there is skywave but the ground wave is stronger
further. The usual problem is antenna efficiency .....in rounded figures 73 is 4
times more difficult than 136, which is 10 times more difficult than 470/500.
Beware of using HF or commercial "folklaw" on
ground systems You MUST measure as you go otherwise you will waste a lot of time
and dollars to no great effect. I measured Ground Loss in experiments with
Finbar early in the 137 era (using a simple transformer-ratio-arm-bridge), and
rolling out "radials" can be a big mistake.....it all depends on your
environment. the first one or maybe two make a difference then it gets you wont
notice the difference To be effective radials on amateur sizes antennas need to
be at least 1/8 wavelength which is over half a mile! Unlike 160m skin
depth in the ground can be 30 feet or more at these frequencies. A lookat
commercial VLF antennas is more helpful. They use massive capacity top loading,
but they can usually choose their site for its suitability.
The only station to make the crossing on 73 when we
still had it on this side was Laurie G3AQC (now SK) He was using 1200W from an
ex Decca Nav TX and a reasonably efficient antenna...... but not that good.His
ERP was probably close to 1watt.
Best of Luck ..... its a pity we will
not get an allocation there again.
Alan
G3NYK (an original UK 73kHz "licence"
holder)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:01
AM
Subject: RE: LF: TA CW?
Stefan;
73 kHz band is going to be difficult from my
preliminary tests. Seems to be a lack of skywave. I think skywave
is going to be rather scarce and best I am doing so far is out to Kansas
but it is ground wave am sure. Got to get the ground system rolled out
here soon as lawn mowing ends. That should help to give me more
field strength on all the bands. Going to try 73 periodically and see
what shakes out!
I have worked PA0A on CW by ear last winter on 500.
Yes our 500 licenses go down to 470 region. In winter we should have no
trouble working CW by ear am sure and will be looking forward to it as you
would be even further away from me than PA. I also worked into N.
Ireland and I went to SSB and was heard and worked Finbar, EI0CL [I forgot the
suffix of his call] cross mode as he has no SSB authorization. Jay,
Warren and I work regularly Sunday evenings on 510 upper throughout
the Winter months.
I see no takers for 73. Gary has a grabber on
73 for us and using QRSS 500 spec lab and I tried last nite but never saw a
trace. With ground system out this Winter his grabber may be a
winner-Bob
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:36:21 +0200
From:
[email protected]To:
[email protected]Subject: LF: TA CW?
Hi Bob,
Success! :-) Welcome! :-)
Sorry i can't receive on 4000m here
since my receivers are mono band homemade DC converters (for 137 kHz and 472
kHz) and direct sampling receivers at 0...24 kHz.
But, i remember you
were the strongest station on MF (is that 472...479 kHz for your licence?)
last season. Are you a CW man as well? Do you think it is realistic to try for
a TA CW QSO? If, then it could work in november to february. So far i'm only
getting sporadic WSPR-2 decodes at WD2XSH/17. My WSPR signal is QRP though. At
least VO1NA copied my signal in GN37OR last year...
Worth a try? I'm
continuously doing overnite WSPR-2 tests on 630m.
73,
Stefan/DK7FC
Am 24.09.2013 23:45, schrieb Bob Raide:
All;
With Stefan's help I seem to have finally made it into
the group. I am Bob Raide W2ZM with exp. license's for 500, 137,
and most recently 73 kHz band.
I am ready to fire up on 72.401 with Qrss
60 if anyone is interested to try for a capture tonite. Or I can
change to 137 if no one is interested in 4000 meters.
500 kHz
call-WE2XGR/6, 137-WE2XEB, 73-WG2XRS/4
Thanks all,
Bob
