Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: iron powder toroid cores

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: iron powder toroid cores
From: "C. Groeger" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:09:40 +0200
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Rik,
One T200_2 is enough for that power. I tried it on 160m at 1000w.
Temperature was abaout 40C.

Hpe cu on 630
Df5qg

Christian Groeger

Rik Strobbe <[email protected]> schrieb:

>Dear all,
>
>
>
>I intend to replace the air coils in the LPF on my 475 kHz transmitter by 
>toroid core coils. I have a stock of T200-2 cores but for the power level want 
>to get (500W would be required to get near the 5 W EIRP limit)  one T200-2 is 
>just on the edge in regard with the maximum flux (and thus temperature rise.
>
>To be on the save side I would use 2 T200-2 toroids for each coil, and there 
>are 2 options:
>
>
>
>1. Glue 2 cores together to make one core of the double height.
>
>This would reduce the flux to 70%, well under the limit. It would also reduce 
>the number of windings to 70%, but due to the double coil height the wire 
>length will increase slightly (abt. 10%).
>
>But as the cores have rounded egdes there wil be some air space between the 
>wire an the core, what might increase loss.
>
>
>
>2. Put 2 toroid core coils, each of half the inductance, in series.
>
>This will also reduce the flux to 70%, but the total wire length needed will 
>increase by abt. 40%.
>
>
>
>In option 1 I will need lees wire (= less loss) compared to option 1, but the 
>air space might undo this advantage.
>
>
>
>So my question is: what will be best?
>
>All advice is welcome.
>
>
>
>73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T
>
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>