To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Wellbrook RX loops |
From: | DENNIS EASTERLING <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 5 Jul 2013 17:26:03 +0100 (BST) |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=fail [email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1373041564; bh=enUyn54JtqgGN6WpisNvgPJHO8kWgZW8xXq7DCwScpk=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RiQpHB/UnA7VFRlV+ezDes2Bcn1rRgbM2Q3hcML/VenWPQBO30w982UiQWbibLY4dk29MG4Uq77T54tHuGDc2Q8d1uag1I6Xt/wCc1P237YvhOV6H9xfk314gmBJifP9+qqAShiLqJd7MEn+ryQF2FiS7hQWWxO8eT9Y9NvynSU= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WO299uvDaESTeX3I829VIeL9gygtSkKt018MqFiQ8SHc9EixuIBjGTaVZosskC4yNH0fdbPTObltbayjzTeERDCi6VqU77XZrUn90tOs7uy9E+pA0KosTIpf6DKUsnwjf5HVKLqCd2lbQbmgf8wv8IsVvF3hChzL0UggAX9Sx2w= ; |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Roger
I use a Wellbrook Loop type ALA1530 (MW/HF) mounted 1m off the ground and a PA0RDT mini-whip mounted about 7m above ground. Sometimes the loop wins other times the miniwhip. The miniwhip is omnidirectional and uses the e field, whereas the loop is directional and uses the magnetic field. The miniwhip is more open to BC breakthough than the loop but more sensitive. I tend to monitor with the miniwhip, and switch to the loop after homing in on the signal if this helps. BC breakthough is overcome using a simple series LC circuit tuned to the required band at the RX end of the coax. The QRM at my QRT can be horrendous, as I am only 100 yards from the OH
lines on the East Coast main railway line, surrounded by houses and a block of flats with associated busy roads. My 'T' transmitting aerial 8m high is useless for RX. I can fully recommend both miniwhip and Wellbrook Loop, both of which cover from LF to 10m. For best results, I suppose a tuned loop about 1m square has the edge, but not as convenient.
73 Dennis M0JXM
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; [email protected] Sent: Friday, 5 July 2013, 7:00 Subject: LF: Wellbrook RX loops Can anyone advise, from actual use, how well a Wellbrook loop works on 136 and 472kHz RX ? The excellent OIP2 and OIP3 figures and directivity suggest one could be very useful. 73s Roger G3XBM |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | R: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna, [email protected] |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna, jrusgrove |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Wellbrook RX loops, pat |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Wellbrook RX loops, Roger Lapthorn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |