To: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: AW: LF: VO1NA OP32 |
From: | "Mike Dennison" <mike.dennison@ntlworld.com> |
Date: | Sat, 22 Jun 2013 18:08:00 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.1306220926110.2108@plato.ucs.mun.ca> |
References: | <6CCE2CE4841C49D39BC5810DDC9E4D88@White>, <Pine.LNX.4.64.1306220841130.1930@plato.ucs.mun.ca>, <Pine.LNX.4.64.1306220926110.2108@plato.ucs.mun.ca> |
Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Sender: | owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
> The relative signal strengths are useful and I hope to take advantage > of this to compare antennas. Joe, beware of comparitive figures. They can be very useful, but are signal/noise ratios, not "signal strengths", so are dependent on static levels this time of year. Thanks for the tests. Mike, G3XDV ========== |
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] a lot of WSPR activity last night + 2 decodes in WSJT from DL4YHF, wolf_dl4yhf |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] a lot of WSPR activity last night + 2 decodes in WSJT from DL4YHF, Dave G3WCB Alternate |
Previous by Thread: | Re: AW: LF: VO1NA OP32, jcraig |
Next by Thread: | AW: AW: LF: VO1NA OP32, Joe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |