Hi Stefan
Well as far as I can tell it should be 4mW.
My original TX gave 200uW calculated and confirmed by James some
time ago. I did increase that with a capacity hat but that was
mechanically a problem to keep in the air and was removed a year
ago..
The current figure ties up with the TX power increase and the
resultant reports. Recently I have been down to 20uW and reports
likewise follow the math. I wanted to try 2uW but I can't get that
low yet, I am working on that, whether it it is worth the effort is
another thing (I could use a 10dB attenuator), I want to confirm
that I should get a decode from G0VQH (91Km) with room to spare.
Interestingly G0VQH is in my 'magic' direction from here and someone
reminded me the other day that I always say re QRP on HF that
Germans live at the bottom of my garden.
:-)
The antenna is still the same, inv. L less than 6m up and 6m horiz.
73 Eddie
On 03/02/2013 21:22, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
Eddie,
Is that really 5 mW ERP?
| Timestamp |
Call |
MHz |
SNR |
Drift |
Grid |
Pwr |
Reporter |
RGrid |
km |
az |
| 2013-02-03 20:50 |
G3ZJO |
0.475632 |
-26 |
1 |
IO92ng |
0.005 |
DK7FC |
JN49ik |
742 |
111 |
That would be quite remarkable over that distance over land.
73, Stefan/DK7FC
Am 03.02.2013 12:29, schrieb g3zjo:
On 03/02/2013 11:04, mal hamilton wrote:
MF
At 1056 z there were 3 stations active
about the same strength on waterfall but only one decoded
PA3EGO
I think it must be a Timing sync
problem
somewhere. I suppose ideally everyone should be locked to
the same time
standard.
g3kev
It's your end Mal, I see that Roger didn't do a runner after
posting
malicious urls. So download atomic kitten or any of the standard
time
utilities and get you computer time sorted.
Mind you can do it by hand, I did for years.and even during M/S
QSO's
because my old computer could loose 3 or 4 seconds whilst making
a 1
min transmission, blimey those were the days. There is only one
Standard time and all time servers will be the same.
Eddie
|
|
