On 02/02/2013 15:56, mal hamilton wrote:
Eddie es Co
Not doing badly here copy LA6TPA at 1312
Km best distance on the current list of intercepts
g3kev
Well of course you are half way there already. :-)
For me OH1LSQ is 1785 Km, my 5mW ERP is often decoded at that range.
2013-01-06 22:48 G3ZJO 0.475699 -26 0 IO92ng 0.005 OH1LSQ KP03td
1785 39
Eddie
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February
02, 2013 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: LF: wspr
decode
Eddie
Now seeing 10 different stns active but
not getting that many decodes, so I am seeing everyone
strong es weak but decoding is a different story that is
where QRSS has the advantage because by now I would have
full ID on all 10.
A good test would be to follow each WSPR
transmission with a QRSS one for comparison and then we
could see who was there but not making a decode
Even the weak ones are good visibility
with me and a lot of them are audible
de g3kev
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February
02, 2013 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: LF: wspr
decode
On 02/02/2013 14:27, mal hamilton wrote:
Eddie
One problem that effects you and
your QRP
I am beaming E/W and you are to my
south in the 40m loop null. I will switch to the inv L
later and maybe see u then. One other thing
Yes you did slew your lobes some time ago and saw me.
I do not see my callsign on the
reports although I have ticked the Upload box.
No you have never uploaded a spot according to the DB. Have
you filled in you details in the Settings box.
I depend on time sync via internet.
Via a separate time server or Muckysoft? Muckysoft can default
to re setting every month or more which is not enough.
Eddie
mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday,
February 02, 2013 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: LF: wspr
decode
Mal
I have increased my power by 10dB so you never know.
However the the other morning running this power on QRSS3
I called and called you precisely on your frequency..
After one call the timing was so right that I sent you a
report over and over but no, you couldn't see me.
Temperamental? In no way, it is solid and reliable believe
me. At first I use to measure accurately the 1.6Hz data
steps when setting up a PIC system, now I set it by eye
and just look to make sure I get decoded to -31dB from
distant stations, tolerant or what.
WSPR copes with frequency drifting TX's some drifting 3
times the width of the signal, and get decoded.
Eddie
On 02/02/2013 13:49, mal hamilton wrote:
Ps
things are improving now
decoding DK7FC and M1GEO watch out you could be
next. Seems a temperamental mode
g3kev
----- Original Message
-----
Sent: Saturday,
February 02, 2013 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: LF:
wspr decode
Eddie
My Logic---If I can decode one
then that should apply to all the others
----- Original Message
-----
Sent: Saturday,
February 02, 2013 11:42 AM
Subject: Re:
LF: wspr decode
Simple one, but timing, is your timing OK?
Eddie
On 02/02/2013 11:32, mal hamilton wrote:
I am seeing quite a lot of
acty on the waterfall and you are probably
there, 8 visible at present but Decode is a
different story.
Like I said if these same
stns were on QRSS I would get an ID and you
would probably be there also
Most are audible with me
and strong enough for a CW qso
de g3kev
----- Original
Message -----
Sent:
Saturday, February 02, 2013 10:55 AM
Subject:
Re: LF: wspr decode
On 02/02/2013 10:40, mal hamilton wrote:
Strangely enough I can
only decode GW8MLA and there are another
several stns active at present on WSPR-2.
Most are strong and audible
de g3kev
Well that will give you a rather distorted view
of the usefulness of the mode then.
And you don't see me,
Beatles
You think you've got everything you want
And your bird can sing
But you don't see me
Do I remember the lyrics right?
Eddie
|
|
