Eddie
Now seeing 10 different stns active but not getting that
many decodes, so I am seeing everyone strong es weak but decoding is a different
story that is where QRSS has the advantage because by now I would have full ID
on all 10.
A good test would be to follow each WSPR transmission with
a QRSS one for comparison and then we could see who was there but not making a
decode
Even the weak ones are good visibility with me and a lot
of them are audible
de g3kev
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 2:50
PM
Subject: Re: LF: wspr decode
On 02/02/2013 14:27, mal hamilton wrote:
Eddie
One problem that effects you and your QRP
I am beaming E/W and you are to my south in the 40m
loop null. I will switch to the inv L later and maybe see u then. One other
thing Yes you did slew your lobes some time ago and
saw me.
I do not see my callsign on the reports although I
have ticked the Upload box. No you have never
uploaded a spot according to the DB. Have you filled in you details in the
Settings box.
I depend on time sync via
internet. Via a separate time server or Muckysoft?
Muckysoft can default to re setting every month or more which is not
enough.
Eddie
mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013
2:13 PM
Subject: Re: LF: wspr decode
Mal
I have increased my power by 10dB so you never
know. However the the other morning running this power on QRSS3 I
called and called you precisely on your frequency.. After one call the
timing was so right that I sent you a report over and over but no, you
couldn't see me. Temperamental? In no way, it is solid and reliable
believe me. At first I use to measure accurately the 1.6Hz data steps when
setting up a PIC system, now I set it by eye and just look to make sure I
get decoded to -31dB from distant stations, tolerant or what. WSPR
copes with frequency drifting TX's some drifting 3 times the width of the
signal, and get decoded.
Eddie
On 02/02/2013 13:49, mal
hamilton wrote:
Ps
things are improving now decoding DK7FC and M1GEO
watch out you could be next. Seems a temperamental mode
g3kev
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013
1:32 PM
Subject: Re: LF: wspr
decode
Eddie
My Logic---If I can decode one then that should
apply to all the others
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 02,
2013 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: LF: wspr
decode
Simple one, but timing, is your timing
OK?
Eddie
On 02/02/2013 11:32, mal hamilton wrote:
I am seeing quite a lot of acty on the
waterfall and you are probably there, 8 visible at present but
Decode is a different story.
Like I said if these same stns were on QRSS
I would get an ID and you would probably be there
also
Most are audible with me and strong enough
for a CW qso
de g3kev
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February
02, 2013 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: LF: wspr
decode
On 02/02/2013 10:40, mal hamilton wrote:
Strangely enough I can only decode
GW8MLA and there are another several stns active at present on
WSPR-2. Most are strong and audible
de g3kev
Well that will give you a rather
distorted view of the usefulness of the mode then.
And
you don't see me,
Beatles
You think you've got
everything you want And your bird can sing But you don't
see me
Do I remember the lyrics
right?
Eddie
|
|