Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: RadCom February 2013 |
| From: | Chris Osborn <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:18:36 +0000 (GMT) |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1358446716; bh=WmSaeZJgNTsWd5L/VQ9cZpd7h/OpjylDHIY1mGrFV8Y=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FiAhxJMIxJdko0HoUzng/V2assLZruBUNN8gTOe6PV5T+8Gw8GPU+vuTLFxe1NSQ+MClh/A4augI4Cjwq+Mh6ancvohNvPSK/AlrLEyPwLgIyNG80IgGbwe3Xgrsx90Yx68NyjZFKb20UmhPn3m02+bLvagoDKG2Ys8uxQ7iRtw= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=In9NXsfmIREZaIM6YA4kk/diIvQMC6K48ryC502Lq9f/y6PKp90b00aJl+4vzF1UQQwun49tGf3RFDJfOTmbRDiG8AHV4Hkef836vx1S2lkePiONrk/CNoLCCCgHzR2+a0jmXyyTL8NceGM/nRnKSre8JXnSNCZjuVWEsjcBjhQ=; |
| In-reply-to: | <4B52EADB3E8E4CC594F35CF05BD07140@IBM7FFA209F07C> |
| References: | <4B52EADB3E8E4CC594F35CF05BD07140@IBM7FFA209F07C> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
I agree.
Also I found the RadCom band plan quite confusing. I don't recall being confused with previously published plans so perhaps I'm getting old ! I have a regular sked on top band A.M. on 1985 kHz According to the band plan we need to operate between 1840 and 1843 kHz ("All Modes" - AM is acceptable in the 'All Modes' segments . . .) and have a bandwidth of 2.7 kHz - a good trick if you can do it with AM - fortunately I have a deep voice! 73 Chris G3XIZ From: Chris <[email protected]> To: RSGB LF Group <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2013, 17:00 Subject: LF: RadCom February 2013 I was surprised to see on page 9 of the latest
RSGB RadCom under '2013 Band Plans', a statement re the 472 - 479kHz band:-
"Activity is limited to modes with 500Hz bandwidth or less". The implication
here is that this is what Ofcom has specified, especially as in the sentence
before it refers to the Notice of Variation. As such, the statement is quite
misleading and untrue.
Who at the RSGB has decided on this new rule? Why
does the RSGB feel the need to impose such a rule? It looks like they are
dictating to the membership, rather than representing them. Frankly a bit of a
cheek.
I note later in 'LF' by Dave, G3YXM, on page 55,
the correct statement is made, referring to the only change in
the licence conditions being the power limitation.
Come back Pete (FMT)! All is
forgiven!!
Vy 73,
Chris, G4AYT. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR-15 on MF, Steinar Aanesland |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: RadCom February 2013, mal hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: RadCom February 2013, Chris |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: RadCom February 2013, Graham |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |