Re: LF: 630m Band Plan

To:	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject:	Re: LF: 630m Band Plan
From:	DENNIS EASTERLING <[email protected]>
Date:	Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:17:51 +0000 (GMT)
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1357233472; bh=+qqY+YchKBCBWSSGHadVFXvEV2USbiVi0GqktxYnLzI=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=b9HZAdfmEYF06+Ls4lRN0py5mXnCpRcX/Eyf8eDT0HACauz3mMiJwyLhsPe5DzMHoCdniq5N5vFtq7DhDltfhkmWVG7n36psAQ3sU3HonpBahIAzFH1F9welIicz7WdgZcvtZ41ZGNTaDnNDbBtxyjFJUCOEi1Bdi10XmRhMEkI=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yDIadB0EvjSOI8yEawhk0N2sr6xfCwnBz4jC5YLL4PDy/G1052rbNN4c85JV8CC8ZXjvJMfMLSAx0VExKGj6OnR/sNhArDsU8R8ANo54698wBy1D1hZy7Zl8CEziYBY2zmqHzZQD9XNMWJwahlE12F1XnNhA2UZxxH1sject1ek=;
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]> <1FE273E837AA4D978CBB5A745E34368A@AGB> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

I think Wolf is right, a nice wide part in the centre and beacons on the high side, but we must remember that some are rockbound at the moment so make due allowance. HNY everybody and hope for some more DX QSOs.

73 Dennis M0JXM

From: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, 3 January 2013, 17:07
Subject: Re: LF: 630m Band Plan

Am 03.01.2013 17:42, schrieb Graham:

The more one looks at this , the more sensible it becomes , I like the idea of a wide band mixed modes area 474 usb ,

As without any formalities we can see the more primitive modes are congregating in the centre of the band , assumedly necessary prevent out of band transmissions due to vfo drift or the like ?

Objection ;o) Let those 'primitive' but predominant modes like CW remain at the start of the band.
So they will suffer from the digital / beacon / etc QRM only from one side.
Also keep beacon-like transmission as far away from the QSO / CW segment as possible. You will know what I mean when the first 24/7 / 365 day beacon appears ( I really hope this day never comes).

Just my two Euro-cents of wisdom though ...

Wolf .

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: LF: 630m Band Plan, Graham Re: LF: 630m Band Plan, wolf_dl4yhf Re: LF: 630m Band Plan, DENNIS EASTERLING <= Re: LF: 630m Band Plan, Graham Re: LF: 630m Band Plan, Graham Re: LF: 630m Band Plan, M0FMT

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: MF NOW, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Date:	Re: LF: 630m Band Plan, Graham
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: 630m Band Plan, wolf_dl4yhf
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: 630m Band Plan, Graham
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]