Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Fw: 5 MHZ NOV RENEWAL

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Fw: 5 MHZ NOV RENEWAL
From: John Pumford-Green <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:05:17 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FOU/vG08HDqMjoyvnazyh/KQWQS29bm/Vj0iR6K6A6o=; b=vAfNHd/KgbcWVqit0r8qqiT6r9A6pnzPxRLdBOPR8QqlryRnc8pt8Luc0eod2ZSj1/ h2OM52kohnuyDCboPgh72vu8WKkE68qVndfcNeKwfww2b5DRNS5EuKDb7tRinYAV2E7y TEMEd+/E2nPfTpc3FIV8ZOmza0ts9aOQLgdOGCIb9YhJlNrhlr8sxA3Pi6VdqkW/vEJJ DN5zKAQrzD+TDYh9v/QZCuTxeZkCFZ/G7rTHdKwE6M5kRnDvvf6zsgtBMBBsWTMhRNs6 p90Bf0bA6H79KX0tyaofwMXVEV6/66pBXaSNlpW/f7JzoEdtOweEOw7EAMGOrwVqvghZ uSWg==
In-reply-to: <010001cddec5$42b69d00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <010001cddec5$42b69d00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0

On 20/12/2012 15:18, mal hamilton wrote:
MF for info I just renewed my 5 Mhz NOV for additional frequencies
and it states clearly that the NOV ISSUE IS 1st January 2013 and
expiry 1st January 2018. This makes it clear that any alterations to
additional frequencies will not commence until the 1st January 2013.
whereas the 472 NOV clearly states NOV ISSUE is 20th December 2012
until 20th December 2017 it could not be any clearer.

Hello Mal, LF,

That's just because you applied for your 5MHz NoV AFTER the RSGB fixed their NoV issuing machine to change the date to the (correct) one of 1 Jan 2013.

Both of my new NoVs, for 5MHz and 472kHz state the same : 20 December 2012, because I applied before they "fixed" their error.

I imagine people applying for a 473kHz NoV later in the day will find it's dated January 1 2013 as well.

You seem to have managed to get one wrongly dated one (the MFpne) and one correctly dated one (5MHz).

The question now is, will they send out correctly dated ones to all those people whove been given incorrect notices?

John
GM4SLV


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>