Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10

from [Markus Vester] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10
From: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:24:21 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1354209868; bh=edLhOGQ87GKU8vYW8Ulh6Db45jbzKc5IcJHv0z8os9Y=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KpJ+3BczDC6x/8EhZ9Wf26Pi1JKNVmP3AUWdop8kxDCdwgtlSA9Ll1IkAfn4Fmfg+ wm9XMAoJukz7GO/PUttPISxNwPFFALVK4qsUUcgOviTueOt4pyy1chXoa7ngXsswrw ZE13ne/no97mAOT/TZ6U8wrreQ4iiBXoKkJb2Gic=
Importance: Normal
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Stefan,
 
yes, theoretically JT9-10 should work down to SNR -37 dB in 2.5 kHz (which would read -41 dB on the Opera scale ;-)
 
Each of your transmissions has been decoded here. Are you receiving JT9 as well?
 
Best 73,
MArkus (DF6NM)
 

Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10

Hi Markus and Michel,

Thanks for the reports :-) Hm, what is the lowest possible SNR in JT9-10? Guess i'm still 6 dB above the limit for Michel.

I'll continue at 1W TX pwr until 18 UTC, then QRO to give UA0SNV a chance. LF propagation looks favourable!

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 29.11.2012 17:47, schrieb Michel Brunel:


1619 5 -31 -0.4 1499.92 1 DK7FC JN49 1W 

1639 6 -29 -0.4 1500.00 1 DK7FC JN49 1W 


Excellent !!

Michel - f5wk
-- 
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Date:  Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10, Stefan Schäfer
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10, Stefan Schäfer
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]