Hi Joe,
I am using v0.2 r2711 running on XP SP3. I got a lot of 15P5H15P67WCU
when I was monitoring JT9-10 today, but when I am trying to play back
the audio files there is no copy of 15P5H15P67WCU.
Slund flies :
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/121101_1510.wav
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/121101_1520.wav
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/121101_1530.wav
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/121101_1540.wav
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/121101_1550.wav
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/121101_1600.wav
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/121101_1610.wav
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/121101_1620.wav
-----------------------
1510 1 -36 -0.4 1450.98 0.00 15P5H15P67WCU
1510 2 -34 -2.1 1452.95 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1510 1 -35 -0.9 1454.77 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1510 1 -36 -2.1 1461.60 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1510 1 -35 0.0 1464.13 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1510 3 -34 -0.9 1467.33 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1510 1 -35 0.9 1472.10 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1510 1 -36 -0.4 1478.50 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1510 1 -35 0.0 1481.47 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1510 2 -35 0.0 1487.17 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1510 2 -34 -1.3 1489.23 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1520 2 -35 0.9 1473.07 0.00
1530 1 -36 -0.4 1488.82 0.00 15P6715P67WCU
1540 1 -36 -2.1 1462.69 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1540 1 -36 -0.4 1464.53 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1540 1 -36 0.9 1469.51 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1540 1 -36 0.0 1473.09 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1540 3 -34 -0.9 1477.61 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1540 1 -36 -1.7 1482.72 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1540 1 -36 -0.4 1484.20 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1540 1 -36 1.7 1488.23 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1550 1 -36 0.9 1421.70 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1550 1 -36 -2.1 1424.27 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1550 1 -36 -0.9 1460.28 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1550 1 -36 1.3 1473.71 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1600 1 -36 -2.1 1449.54 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1600 2 -35 -2.1 1461.60 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1600 2 -35 -0.9 1469.90 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1600 1 -36 -2.1 1472.97 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1600 1 -36 -2.1 1474.64 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1600 1 -36 -0.4 1476.27 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1600 2 -34 -0.4 1485.16 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1600 1 -36 0.4 1487.85 0.00 15P6715P67WCV
1610 2 -35 2.2 1406.01 0.00--
LA5VNA Steinar
loc:JO59jq
Mal and spam filtering: STRONG
www.opera.no
Den 01.11.2012 16:48, skrev Joe Taylor:
> No AC power at home, yet. My wife and I are essentially camping out, at
> home. We have plenty of firewood and a good fireplace, but we are
> bored. As you will have heard, we are among the lucky ones.
>
> I am writing this message, once again, from my university office.
>
> A few words for those reporting "too much audio" on input to WSJT-X.
>
> On my development system the same input level is required to make both
> WSPR and WSJT-X happy. Likewise on my shack computer. For example, see
> the screen shot posted at
> http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJTX_WSPR.png
>
> Could it be that those who report having to move audio level sliders far
> downward are using 24-bit soundcards, and their drivers are sending the
> low 16 bits (via portaudio) to WSJT-X? I do not presently have another
> explanation. I do not find any level discrepancies here. Obviously, I
> cannot test hardware I do not have access to.
>
> Perhaps I should put in a digital attenuator to handle this issue?
>
> On a possibly related matter: I am aware that a wide variety of hardware
> is being used to generate and receive signals on our MF and LF bands.
> In due course it may be desirable for WSJT-X to use 48 kHz sample rate
> for input, as well as output -- and even to offer I/Q input and output
> for direct-conversion rigs. These features have been in WSPR 3.0 for a
> long time, and they work well. If there is sufficient demand they could
> be introduced in WSJT-X as well.
>
> At present, my available time is being spend on the JT9 decoder. With
> well-behaved signals and a clean noise background, the JT9 threshold
> decoding sensitivities are those given in a table at the end of the
> Quick-Start User's Guide,
> http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJT-X_Users_Guide.pdf .
>
> JT9 performance may be degraded in the presence of QRM, static crashes,
> plasma TV birdies, frequency drift, etc. Extensive experience with JT65
> on both EME and HF paths shows that most of these annoyances can be
> minimized or eliminated by suitable optimizations in the receiving
> software. These optimizations have not yet been started, in part
> because I do not yet have suitable examples of *.wav files recorded in
> difficult receiving situations.
>
> Nobody has yet sent me a file that, when opened, produces the result
> "15P6715P67WCV".
>
> Maybe we'll have power again by tomorrow? Or maybe not.
>
> -- 73, Joe, K1JT
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/rsgb_lf_group/
>
> <*> Your email settings:
> Individual Email | Traditional
>
> <*> To change settings online go to:
> http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/rsgb_lf_group/join
> (Yahoo! ID required)
>
> <*> To change settings via email:
> [email protected]
> [email protected]
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/info/terms.html
>
>
>
|
