To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Soundcard issues |
From: | g3zjo <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:07:47 +0000 |
Cc: | Joe Taylor <[email protected]> |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAHAQVWPFQdJQxMtkvzOvGZ-SbzGk3WTptmvMqDzBqpECjzjpgQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 |
Hi Joe / LF On my development system the same input level is required to make both WSPR and WSJT-X happy. Likewise on my shack computer. For example, see the screen shot posted athttp://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJTX_WSPR.png Interesting that when I talk of WSPR levels I refer to WSPR2.Someone sent me a screen Grab the other day Just like the one you show, but of WSPR2 and WSJT-X, that grab confirmed that when WSPR2 shows 0dB, WSJTX is right up the top of the scale just like I experience. They added that WSPR2 11 has the same, their words, ridiculously high, sound levels. I have never tried it will down load it now. Eddie G3ZJO |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Attempts for JT9-1 QSO on LF, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Attempts for JT9-1 QSO on LF, Markus Vester |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Soundcard issues, Joe Taylor |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Soundcard issues, wolf_dl4yhf |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |