To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: SM6BGP |
From: | wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:36:00 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 |
Am 25.11.2012 17:41, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: MF,SM6BGP is running a QRSS-3 BEACON at 472.2 kHz. Mal, what do you think about that? ;-) Similar as I do, even though I don't always agree with Mal.Don't we have enough (commercial) MF beacons ? Why not move our own beacons to the upper end of the band, in the vincinity of the other beacons, and closer the QRSS / digimode area where beaconing doesn't cause so much hassle as near the 'CW frequency', where most CW receivers are "parking in idle" ? 73, Wolf (thinking twice if its worth to try CW around 472.3 kHz tonight.. sigh...) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: VO1NA at 20:00 - or not?, jcraig |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Off air due to fire, Mike Dennison |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: SM6BGP, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: SM6BGP, mal hamilton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |