To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Testing JT9-1 on LF: |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 17 Nov 2012 08:16:30 -0500 (EST) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1353158191; bh=IP6n8RVB6xyh6GK9GPLZK/fTqj2fYRAirPkZYNYTXRE=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ympp6T4+GZgkEyIxApA3OjxiDih16npBnJfjvRZY77ghFCeoqdkwpzKc0n5Q2yued U1VsAa1PcJCzmdSPmU+/pryH5T5rkBBn5zPSnIqnzJThkgNkXDGL8gQ1KQLHDLS7dH dVQuh5LP+RKEYAYmz/Wz/d+TmrNTaytXz91NAcTE= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Joe,
my fault... initially I didn't have the NTP software running. When I started it in the middle of the QSO it corrected a 1.5 second clock error. This unintended experiment confirms that JT9 v0.4 is indeed much more robust than prior versions.
Many thanks for this great piece of work!
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
Von: Joe Taylor <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Fr, 16 Nov 2012 8:37 pm Betreff: Re: Testing JT9-1 on LF: Hi Markus, Stefan, and all, |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: TEST JT9-2 500khz + 1400hz OFF, g3zjo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: TEST JT9-2 500khz + 1400hz OFF, Robert Bennett |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Testing JT9-1 on LF:, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: Testing JT9-1 on LF:, Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |