Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Answers to some JT9 questions |
| From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:04:51 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <005901cdb513$6a2750e0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <005901cdb513$6a2750e0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
OK Mal,Are you ready for a QSO? I'm already receiving in JT9-1 on 137.43 +-0.05 kHz! 73, Stefan Am 28.10.2012 14:52, schrieb mal hamilton: Stefan Why is a mapping feature necessary when you can have a real time QSO and get a direct report like most operators do on HF What you are suggesting is a BEACON mode again and QSL via INTERNET. The intention is a QSO mode and get away from Beacon mentality. de g3kev |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Answers to some JT9 questions, mal hamilton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: wsjtx, mal hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Answers to some JT9 questions, mal hamilton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Answers to some JT9 questions, mal hamilton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |